| # Copyright 2017 The PDFium Authors | |
| # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | |
| # found in the LICENSE file. | |
| """Classes that draw conclusions out of a comparison and represent them.""" | |
| from collections import Counter | |
| FORMAT_RED = '\033[01;31m{0}\033[00m' | |
| FORMAT_GREEN = '\033[01;32m{0}\033[00m' | |
| FORMAT_MAGENTA = '\033[01;35m{0}\033[00m' | |
| FORMAT_CYAN = '\033[01;36m{0}\033[00m' | |
| FORMAT_NORMAL = '{0}' | |
| RATING_FAILURE = 'failure' | |
| RATING_REGRESSION = 'regression' | |
| RATING_IMPROVEMENT = 'improvement' | |
| RATING_NO_CHANGE = 'no_change' | |
| RATING_SMALL_CHANGE = 'small_change' | |
| RATINGS = [ | |
| RATING_FAILURE, RATING_REGRESSION, RATING_IMPROVEMENT, RATING_NO_CHANGE, | |
| RATING_SMALL_CHANGE | |
| ] | |
| RATING_TO_COLOR = { | |
| RATING_FAILURE: FORMAT_MAGENTA, | |
| RATING_REGRESSION: FORMAT_RED, | |
| RATING_IMPROVEMENT: FORMAT_CYAN, | |
| RATING_NO_CHANGE: FORMAT_GREEN, | |
| RATING_SMALL_CHANGE: FORMAT_NORMAL, | |
| } | |
| class ComparisonConclusions: | |
| """All conclusions drawn from a comparison. | |
| This is initialized empty and then processes pairs of results for each test | |
| case, determining the rating for that case, which can be: | |
| "failure" if either or both runs for the case failed. | |
| "regression" if there is a significant increase in time for the test case. | |
| "improvement" if there is a significant decrease in time for the test case. | |
| "no_change" if the time for the test case did not change at all. | |
| "small_change" if the time for the test case changed but within the threshold. | |
| """ | |
| def __init__(self, threshold_significant): | |
| """Initializes an empty ComparisonConclusions. | |
| Args: | |
| threshold_significant: Float with the tolerance beyond which changes in | |
| measurements are considered significant. | |
| The change is considered as a multiplication rather than an addition | |
| of a fraction of the previous measurement, that is, a | |
| threshold_significant of 1.0 will flag test cases that became over | |
| 100% slower (> 200% of the previous time measured) or over 100% faster | |
| (< 50% of the previous time measured). | |
| threshold_significant 0.02 -> 98.04% to 102% is not significant | |
| threshold_significant 0.1 -> 90.9% to 110% is not significant | |
| threshold_significant 0.25 -> 80% to 125% is not significant | |
| threshold_significant 1 -> 50% to 200% is not significant | |
| threshold_significant 4 -> 20% to 500% is not significant | |
| """ | |
| self.threshold_significant = threshold_significant | |
| self.threshold_significant_negative = (1 / (1 + threshold_significant)) - 1 | |
| self.params = {'threshold': threshold_significant} | |
| self.summary = ComparisonSummary() | |
| self.case_results = {} | |
| def ProcessCase(self, case_name, before, after): | |
| """Feeds a test case results to the ComparisonConclusions. | |
| Args: | |
| case_name: String identifying the case. | |
| before: Measurement for the "before" version of the code. | |
| after: Measurement for the "after" version of the code. | |
| """ | |
| # Switch 0 to None to simplify the json dict output. All zeros are | |
| # considered failed runs, so they will be represented by "null". | |
| if not before: | |
| before = None | |
| if not after: | |
| after = None | |
| if not before or not after: | |
| ratio = None | |
| rating = RATING_FAILURE | |
| else: | |
| ratio = (float(after) / before) - 1.0 | |
| if ratio > self.threshold_significant: | |
| rating = RATING_REGRESSION | |
| elif ratio < self.threshold_significant_negative: | |
| rating = RATING_IMPROVEMENT | |
| elif ratio == 0: | |
| rating = RATING_NO_CHANGE | |
| else: | |
| rating = RATING_SMALL_CHANGE | |
| case_result = CaseResult(case_name, before, after, ratio, rating) | |
| self.summary.ProcessCaseResult(case_result) | |
| self.case_results[case_name] = case_result | |
| def GetSummary(self): | |
| """Gets the ComparisonSummary with consolidated totals.""" | |
| return self.summary | |
| def GetCaseResults(self): | |
| """Gets a dict mapping each test case identifier to its CaseResult.""" | |
| return self.case_results | |
| def GetOutputDict(self): | |
| """Returns a conclusions dict with all the conclusions drawn. | |
| Returns: | |
| A serializable dict with the format illustrated below: | |
| { | |
| "version": 1, | |
| "params": { | |
| "threshold": 0.02 | |
| }, | |
| "summary": { | |
| "total": 123, | |
| "failure": 1, | |
| "regression": 2, | |
| "improvement": 1, | |
| "no_change": 100, | |
| "small_change": 19 | |
| }, | |
| "comparison_by_case": { | |
| "testing/resources/new_test.pdf": { | |
| "before": None, | |
| "after": 1000, | |
| "ratio": None, | |
| "rating": "failure" | |
| }, | |
| "testing/resources/test1.pdf": { | |
| "before": 100, | |
| "after": 120, | |
| "ratio": 0.2, | |
| "rating": "regression" | |
| }, | |
| "testing/resources/test2.pdf": { | |
| "before": 100, | |
| "after": 2000, | |
| "ratio": 19.0, | |
| "rating": "regression" | |
| }, | |
| "testing/resources/test3.pdf": { | |
| "before": 1000, | |
| "after": 1005, | |
| "ratio": 0.005, | |
| "rating": "small_change" | |
| }, | |
| "testing/resources/test4.pdf": { | |
| "before": 1000, | |
| "after": 1000, | |
| "ratio": 0.0, | |
| "rating": "no_change" | |
| }, | |
| "testing/resources/test5.pdf": { | |
| "before": 1000, | |
| "after": 600, | |
| "ratio": -0.4, | |
| "rating": "improvement" | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| """ | |
| output_dict = {} | |
| output_dict['version'] = 1 | |
| output_dict['params'] = {'threshold': self.threshold_significant} | |
| output_dict['summary'] = self.summary.GetOutputDict() | |
| output_dict['comparison_by_case'] = { | |
| cr.case_name.decode('utf-8'): cr.GetOutputDict() | |
| for cr in self.GetCaseResults().values() | |
| } | |
| return output_dict | |
| class ComparisonSummary: | |
| """Totals computed for a comparison.""" | |
| def __init__(self): | |
| self.rating_counter = Counter() | |
| def ProcessCaseResult(self, case_result): | |
| self.rating_counter[case_result.rating] += 1 | |
| def GetTotal(self): | |
| """Gets the number of test cases processed.""" | |
| return sum(self.rating_counter.values()) | |
| def GetCount(self, rating): | |
| """Gets the number of test cases processed with a given rating.""" | |
| return self.rating_counter[rating] | |
| def GetOutputDict(self): | |
| """Returns a dict that can be serialized with all the totals.""" | |
| result = {'total': self.GetTotal()} | |
| for rating in RATINGS: | |
| result[rating] = self.GetCount(rating) | |
| return result | |
| class CaseResult: | |
| """The conclusion for the comparison of a single test case.""" | |
| def __init__(self, case_name, before, after, ratio, rating): | |
| """Initializes an empty ComparisonConclusions. | |
| Args: | |
| case_name: String identifying the case. | |
| before: Measurement for the "before" version of the code. | |
| after: Measurement for the "after" version of the code. | |
| ratio: Difference between |after| and |before| as a fraction of |before|. | |
| rating: Rating for this test case. | |
| """ | |
| self.case_name = case_name | |
| self.before = before | |
| self.after = after | |
| self.ratio = ratio | |
| self.rating = rating | |
| def GetOutputDict(self): | |
| """Returns a dict with the test case's conclusions.""" | |
| return { | |
| 'before': self.before, | |
| 'after': self.after, | |
| 'ratio': self.ratio, | |
| 'rating': self.rating | |
| } | |
| def PrintConclusionsDictHumanReadable(conclusions_dict, colored, key=None): | |
| """Prints a conclusions dict in a human-readable way. | |
| Args: | |
| conclusions_dict: Dict to print. | |
| colored: Whether to color the output to highlight significant changes. | |
| key: String with the CaseResult dictionary key to sort the cases. | |
| """ | |
| # Print header | |
| print('=' * 80) | |
| print('{0:>11s} {1:>15s} {2}'.format('% Change', 'Time after', 'Test case')) | |
| print('-' * 80) | |
| color = FORMAT_NORMAL | |
| # Print cases | |
| if key is not None: | |
| case_pairs = sorted( | |
| conclusions_dict['comparison_by_case'].iteritems(), | |
| key=lambda kv: kv[1][key]) | |
| else: | |
| case_pairs = sorted(conclusions_dict['comparison_by_case'].iteritems()) | |
| for case_name, case_dict in case_pairs: | |
| if colored: | |
| color = RATING_TO_COLOR[case_dict['rating']] | |
| if case_dict['rating'] == RATING_FAILURE: | |
| print(u'{} to measure time for {}'.format( | |
| color.format('Failed'), case_name).encode('utf-8')) | |
| continue | |
| print(u'{0} {1:15,d} {2}'.format( | |
| color.format('{:+11.4%}'.format(case_dict['ratio'])), | |
| case_dict['after'], case_name).encode('utf-8')) | |
| # Print totals | |
| totals = conclusions_dict['summary'] | |
| print('=' * 80) | |
| print('Test cases run: %d' % totals['total']) | |
| if colored: | |
| color = FORMAT_MAGENTA if totals[RATING_FAILURE] else FORMAT_GREEN | |
| print('Failed to measure: %s' % color.format(totals[RATING_FAILURE])) | |
| if colored: | |
| color = FORMAT_RED if totals[RATING_REGRESSION] else FORMAT_GREEN | |
| print('Regressions: %s' % color.format(totals[RATING_REGRESSION])) | |
| if colored: | |
| color = FORMAT_CYAN if totals[RATING_IMPROVEMENT] else FORMAT_GREEN | |
| print('Improvements: %s' % color.format(totals[RATING_IMPROVEMENT])) |